Cinematographer
ProRes ist pragmatisch. Es bietet Plattform-Kompatibilität und Speicher-Effizienz, während es genug Qualität für anspruchsvolle Grading behält. Für viele Produktionen ausreichend und sicherer als RAW-Alternativen.
Apple ProRes is a family of high-performance intermediate video codecs for professional video production and post-production, available in various quality levels from ProRes Proxy to ProRes Max.
Apple ProRes is a family of intermediate video codecs specifically developed for professional video production, editing, and color correction. Unlike RAW, ProRes is a mosaic codec with color interpolation, gamma curves, and optional compression.
ProRes is available in several quality levels:
2007: Apple introduces ProRes 422
- Based on QuickTime
- Response to Adobe DNxHD (Avid Alternative)
- Designed for Final Cut Pro workflows
2011: ProRes 422 HQ introduced
- 10-bit color depth
- Better grading flexibility
- Becomes industry standard
2021: ProRes Max launched
- 12-bit color depth
- Support for 4K and higher
- RAW competition
2024: ProRes Raw still niche
- Higher acceptance but not yet standard| Codec | Bit Depth | Chroma Sampling | Data Rate (4K) | Primary Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ProRes Proxy | 8-bit | 4:2:0 | ~50 Mb/s | Offline Editing |
| ProRes LT | 8-bit | 4:2:0 | ~100 Mb/s | Editing with Previews |
| ProRes 422 | 10-bit | 4:2:2 | ~250 Mb/s | Standard Editing |
| ProRes 422 HQ | 10-bit | 4:2:2 | ~500 Mb/s | Premium Grading |
| ProRes Max | 12-bit | 4:4:4 | ~1000 Mb/s | High-End Mastering |
ProRes Proxy:
Data Rate: 50 Mb/s
1 Hour: 22.5 GB
Use: Offline Editing (rough cuts)
ProRes 422 Standard:
Data Rate: 250 Mb/s
1 Hour: 112.5 GB
Use: Online Editing, moderate grading
ProRes 422 HQ:
Data Rate: 500 Mb/s
1 Hour: 225 GB
Use: Premium Grading, Color Correction
ProRes Max:
Data Rate: 1000 Mb/s
1 Hour: 450 GB
Use: Mastering, Extreme Grading
RAW Comparison (ARRI RAW):
Data Rate: 1100 Mb/s
1 Hour: 500+ GB
Difference: ProRes Max is almost as large as RAW!ProRes utilizes various Chroma Sampling modes:
4:2:0 Subsampling (ProRes Proxy/LT):
┌─┬─┬─┬─┐
│Y│Y│Y│Y│ Luma (brightness) - full resolution
├─┼─┼─┼─┤
│C│ │C│ │ Chroma (color) - 1/4 resolution
├─┼─┼─┼─┤
│Y│Y│Y│Y│ Luma
├─┼─┼─┼─┤
│C│ │C│ │ Chroma - half as often
└─┴─┴─┴─┘
Result: Noticeable color loss (suitable for TV)
4:2:2 Subsampling (ProRes 422 Standard/HQ):
┌─┬─┬─┬─┐
│Y│Y│Y│Y│ Luma
├─┼─┼─┼─┤
│C│ │C│ │ Chroma - 1/2 horizontally
├─┼─┼─┼─┤
│Y│Y│Y│Y│ Luma
├─┼─┼─┼─┤
│C│ │C│ │ Chroma
└─┴─┴─┴─┘
Result: Minimal color loss (Professional Standard)
4:4:4 Sampling (ProRes Max):
┌─┬─┬─┬─┐
│Y│Y│Y│Y│ Luma
├─┼─┼─┼─┤
│C│C│C│C│ Chroma - Full resolution
├─┼─┼─┼─┤
│Y│Y│Y│Y│ Luma
├─┼─┼─┼─┤
│C│C│C│C│ Chroma - Full resolution
└─┴─┴─┴─┘
Result: No color loss, RAW-likeDecision Tree:
Budget < €500k?
→ ProRes 422 HQ (Standard)
Budget €500k-2M?
→ ProRes 422 HQ (or RAW for premium)
Budget > €2M?
→ Decision: RAW vs. ProRes Max
→ RAW: Maximum flexibility
→ ProRes Max: Practical compromise
Streaming Project (fast turnarounds)?
→ ProRes Proxy for editing
→ ProRes 422 HQ for grading
→ ProRes Max only if budget allowsMulti-Codec Recording (Best Practice):
Camera records simultaneously:
1. Primary: ProRes 422 HQ (Edit Master)
2. Backup: ProRes Proxy (Cloud Backup)
Advantage:
- Editor can work with proxy immediately
- Full quality for final grading
- Redundancy without wasted space
Practical Setup (ARRI Alexa):
- On-board: ProRes 422 HQ to SSD
- Secondary: ProRes Proxy to USB Drive
- Back up both dailyStandard ProRes Editing Pipeline:
1. Capture & Transcode
→ Raw ProRes footage
→ Or: Proxy generation for fast editing
2. Assembly (Rough Cut)
→ Final Cut Pro / Premiere with proxy
→ Super fast playback
→ No render times
3. Online Edit
→ Switch to ProRes 422 HQ
→ Color grading prepared
→ Full quality until the end
4. Color Grading
→ ProRes 422 HQ input
→ DaVinci/Lumetri/Baselight
→ ProRes Max output (if needed)
5. Delivery
→ ProRes 422 HQ for archives
→ Rec.709 master for broadcasting
→ H.264 for streamingProRes 422 HQ vs. Avid DNxHD 444:
Data Rate:
ProRes HQ: 500 Mb/s (4K)
DNxHD: 440 Mb/s (4K)
→ Similar
Color Depth:
ProRes HQ: 10-bit 4:2:2
DNxHD: 10-bit 4:4:4
→ DNxHD technically superior (but less workflow support)
Platform Support:
ProRes: macOS native, Windows with plugin
DNxHD: Windows native, macOS limited
→ ProRes dominates Mac-based workflows
Market Share:
ProRes: ~70% of professional workflows
DNxHD: ~20% (Avid legacy shops)ProRes 422 HQ vs. H.264 (Canon XF-AVC):
Compression:
ProRes: Intraframe (all frames fully encoded)
H.264: Interframe (only differences between frames)
→ ProRes: Faster for editing, but larger
Quality:
ProRes HQ: Visually Lossless
H.264: Lossy (visible quality degradation)
→ ProRes: Clearly better for grading
Editing:
ProRes: Real-time playback even on laptops
H.264: Transcoding necessary for editing
→ ProRes: Significantly more practical
File Size:
ProRes 422 HQ (4K): 500 Mb/s
H.264 (4K): 100-150 Mb/s
→ H.264: 3-5x more efficient (but quality suffers)
Use Case:
ProRes: Professional Production
H.264: Consumer / StreamingScenario: Live Concert Recording (3 Cameras)
Setup:
- Camera 1: ProRes 422 HQ (Main Camera)
- Camera 2: ProRes 422 HQ (Wide)
- Camera 3: ProRes 422 HQ (Close-up)
Pros:
✓ Synchronization trivial (ProRes is frame-accurate)
✓ Editing possible on a laptop (no render times)
✓ Consistent color grading across all cameras
Data:
- 3 cameras × 1.5 hours: 1 TB total
- Storage management: Minimal
- Backup: One external drive is sufficientScenario: Superhero Action Film
Intermediate Layers:
- RAW Capture (Camera)
- ProRes Proxy (Daily Review)
- ProRes 422 (VFX Plates)
- ProRes Max (VFX Compositing)
- Rec.709 Master (DCP)
Workflow:
1. RAW recorded on-set
2. Dailies: ProRes Proxy transcoded
3. VFX: ProRes 422 for tracking/compositing
4. Final Output: ProRes Max (or Rec.709)
Advantage: RAW offers maximum flexibility, ProRes provides efficient workflowsScenario: Documentary for Netflix
Strategy:
- Shooting: ProRes 422 (Balanced Quality/Size)
- Editing: ProRes Proxy (Fast Timeline)
- Grading: ProRes 422 HQ (Premium Look)
- Output: ProRes 422 HQ (Archive)
- Delivery: H.264 (Netflix Spec)
Data Management:
- 50 hours footage: 2-3 TB
- Reasonable backup burden
- Standard workflowProRes Max is Apple's response to RAW requirements:
ProRes Max Specifications:
- Bit Depth: 12-bit
- Chroma: 4:4:4
- Data Rate: 1000 Mb/s (4K)
- Support: Final Cut Pro 10.4+, DaVinci 19+
Comparison to RAW:
ProRes Max:
✓ Significantly smaller than RAW (~50% size)
✓ Faster to transfer
✓ Native software support
✗ Color interpolation already applied (not raw)
✗ Less latitude for error correction
RAW:
✓ Maximum flexibility
✓ No color decisions pre-baked
✗ Very large files
✗ Specialized storage infrastructure
Decision:
Budget + Infrastructure for RAW?
→ Use RAW
Otherwise:
→ ProRes Max is an acceptable alternativeProRes Evolution (2024-2030):
Apple's Strategy:
- Continue optimizing ProRes
- ProRes Raw integration
- Cloud-compatible codec variants
- AI-based encoding
Market Forecast:
- ProRes remains workflow standard
- ProRes Max grows for premium projects
- ProRes Raw remains niche (< 10% market share)
- H.264 continues to be used for consumer contentProRes Codec Selection:
Offline Editing (Rough Cut)?
→ ProRes Proxy
Online Editing (Fine Cut)?
→ ProRes 422
Standard Color Grading?
→ ProRes 422 HQ
Premium Grading?
→ ProRes Max (or RAW)
Archive?
→ ProRes 422 HQ (Secure long-term)ProRes ist pragmatisch. Es bietet Plattform-Kompatibilität und Speicher-Effizienz, während es genug Qualität für anspruchsvolle Grading behält. Für viele Produktionen ausreichend und sicherer als RAW-Alternativen.
ProRes ist ideal für schnelle Postproduktion mit schneller Playback-Performance und flexibler Codec-Auswahl. ProRes 422 HQ reicht für die meisten Grades, ProRes MAX für Extreme-Grading.
ProRes ist mein Favorit. Moderate Dateigrößen (3-5x kleiner als RAW), breite Codec-Unterstützung, einfaches Management. Standardisierte Speicher-Anforderungen, keine speziellen SSDs nötig.
1. Was beschreibt „Apple ProRes Codec" am besten?
2. Zu welchem Department gehört „Apple ProRes Codec"?
3. Wie viele verschiedene Fachperspektiven bietet dieser Eintrag?
The Lexikon is part of the Filmfarm ecosystem — alongside budgeting (FilmBalance), an industry magazine (FilmCircus) and crew networking (FilmCall, CrewMesh). One shared vocabulary for the whole production.